| Whole school community |
| |
Building a safe and supportive school and preventing bullying |
| |
Engage the whole school community in a cycle of continuous improvement |
Evaluation, planning and action need to be ongoing and reflective to have a positive influence upon the culture that informs abusive behaviours and beliefs in our schools and society. These activities need to include all stakeholders and aspects of school life, and respond to local needs. Only in this way will new and viable options be created in school communities and society.
The wellbeing of school community relationships can be measured quantitatively and qualitatively through behaviour and attendance records; surveys of perceived safety; observations of homogeneity and diversity of social groups; and reports from students, carers and the local media. (For some ideas on measuring the wellbeing of school community relationships see Where to now.)
A democratic, participatory or collaborative approach provides a means for incorporating quantitative and qualitative techniques, engaging diverse groups in a cycle of continuous learning, informed action and improvement based on rigorous testing and alignment of theory and practice. Participatory action research (also called action learning) and learning circles are examples of this approach.
The approach is particularly useful for improving social situations because it:
While participatory action research can begin with just a small group, for example a few teachers, or a teacher and class choosing to improve their own practice, 'critical mass' is achieved when all groups are voluntarily and actively represented in making a positive difference.
A group of teachers in a primary school noted an increase in bullying and harassment about race, class and gender - and inconsistency in their responses to these behaviours. They gathered school data and information from university people studying violence and harassment in schools, engaged a 'critical friend' to help them consider their own practices, and consulted with other staff and other community members. They adapted the curriculum to enable students and teachers to survey school 'hot spots', learn about power and social constructs, learn new relationship skills and work with younger students to develop safer and more equitable social dynamics for all groups. Teachers, students and carers contribute to the ongoing monitoring and evaluation process.
Schools in action:
Examining gender, race, class
and power
In response to literacy concerns and boys' aggression, a cluster of primary schools developed a 'Which Boys/Which Girls?' literacy project. Teachers formed a learning circle to review individual research projects and reflect on current theory about social change, power, gender equity and literacy. Teachers' and students' thinking and practices are changing, and parents are being invited to participate.
Schools in action:
Social action through literacy
'Conflict Resolution at School: Building Compassionate Communities',
Social Alternatives 21(1) January, pp. 49 - 55
Carter, C. (2002)
An article that examines the goals and factors that inhibit the success of school conflict resolution programs including mediated dispute resolution. Includes recommendations for increasing the productivity of conflict mediation, and a list of references.
'Challenges for Peace Educators at the Beginning of the 21st Century', Social Alternatives 21(1)
January, pp. 28 - 31
Harris, I. (2002)
Do It Yourself Social Research
Wadworth, Yoland (1997), 2nd edition
Sydney: Allen and Unwin
Everyday Evaluation on the Run
Wadsworth, Yoland (1997), 2nd edition
Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
The Action Research Planner
Kemmis, Stephen and McTaggart, Robin (1988) (Eds), 3rd Edition
Melbourne: Deakin University